History
  • No items yet
midpage
L. D. Powell Co. v. Casteel
198 P. 588
Okla.
1921
Check Treatment
HARRISON, C. J.

This record discloses that motion for new trial was overruled December 22, 1919, and plaintiff given 60 days, in addition to the 15 days provided by law, to serve ease-made: March 5, 1920, an extension of 60 days additional was granted, May 4, 1920, an extension of 15 days in addi *118 tion to the time already granted was made, making 150 days in all for serving ease-made, which expired May 20, 1920; the case-made was not served until May 22nd, two days after the time had expired.

Under the rule heretofore followed, a purported case-made, which has not been served within 15 days from the date of the Judgment or order appealed from, or within an extension of time duly allowed, cannot be consider, d by this court for lack of jurisdiction. Cook v. Cook, 79 Okla. 222, 192 Pac. 215; Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. King, 76 Okla. 316, 185 Pac. 439; Morgan v. Board of Co. Com’rs, 59 Okla. 290, 159 Pac. 514; Wills v. Buzbee, 42 Okla. 206, 140 Pac. 1146; Gilbert v. Divelbiss, 47 Okla. 340, 148 Pac. 689.

This case might be reviewed as upon a transcript, having been filed within six months from the date of final judgment, but as the p tition in error presents no question reviewable upon transcript, there is nothing before this court. Cook v. Cook, supra; Thompson v. Stevens, 73 Oklahoma, 175 Pac. 742; Collins v. Garvey, 67 Oklahoma, 171 Pac. 330.

For these reasons, the appeal is dismissed.

JOHNSON, McNEILL, MILLER, ELTING, and KENNAMER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: L. D. Powell Co. v. Casteel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: May 31, 1921
Citation: 198 P. 588
Docket Number: 11516
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.