Kutz v. Walgreen Co.

1:05-cv-02999 | S.D.N.Y. | Sep 26, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________ X IH re: EPHEDRA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ________________________________________ X PERTAINS TO ALL CASES JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. The following typographical errors in the Court's Opinion and Order dated September 19, 2005 are hereby corrected: - On the second line of page 30, after the words “as modified above,ll insert the words “is admissible,”. - On the eleventh line of page 37, in place of the words “both the PCC and PCC,” substitute “both the PCC and DCC”. In addition, it should be noted that, prior to the opinion being filed, a version was inadvertently circulated to counsel that contained a typographical error in the sentence beginning on the sixth line of page 26 with the words “Although the gaps ....” As corrected in the filed opinion, the sentence reads: “Although the gaps between such data and definitive evidence of causality are real and subject to challenge before the jury, they are not so great as to require the opinion to be excluded from evidence.ll SO ORDERED QM QJ/A~ Dav;ed= New York, New York VJED s. RAKOFFV September 25, 2005