midpage

Kurz v. United StatesKurz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Apr 30, 1958
No. 332, Docket 24952
Versions:
PER CURIAM.

Here the executors under a will are claiming a refund of estate taxes paid by them on the value of a trust estate as to which their testator had retained a power of revocation. They argue that this trust for the benefit of children carried into effect only a provision of a separation agreement between him and his wife which, indeed, called for the trust, *812but without power of revocation. As District Judge Palmieri points out, however, in his well reasoned opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 156 F.Supp. 99, it is both good sense and good law that these closely integrated and nearly contemporaneous documents be construed together, thus showing a retained power which makes the corpus taxable under I.R.C.1939, § 811(d)(2). We affirm on the opinion below.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kurz v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Apr 30, 1958
Citations: 254 F.2d 811; No. 332, Docket 24952
Docket Number: No. 332, Docket 24952
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In
    Kurz v. United States, 254 F.2d 811