Kurtz v. Oremland

Nov 22, 1954
Versions:109 A.2d 286
16 N.J. 454

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below. 33 N.J. Super. 443 (Ch. Div. 1954).

For affirmance — Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 4.

For reversal — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices JACOBS and BRENNAN — 3.