History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne
11 N.J. Super. 433
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
1951
Check Treatment
11 N.J. Super. 433 (1951)
78 A.2d 429

CASIMIR KUROWSKI AND LUCILLE KUROWSKI, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE, A CORPORATE BODY, AND MORRIS PADWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1951.
Decided January 17, 1951.

*444 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Stephen P. Piga argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. William Rubin argued the cause for the defendant-respondent Board of Adjustment of the City of Bayonne.

Mr. A. Alfred Fink, attorney for defendant-respondent Morris Padwe.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

Case Details

Case Name: Kurowski v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bayonne
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Jan 17, 1951
Citation: 11 N.J. Super. 433
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.