History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kupstis v. Michaud
214 Conn. 801
Conn.
1990
Check Treatment

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 425, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the attorney referee’s delay in issuing his report violate (a) General Statutes § 51-183b; (b) applicable provisions of the Practice Book; or (c) the due process *768rights of the plaintiff under the United States constitution or article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?”

Decided February 8, 1990 Michael A. D’Amico, in support of the petition. Robert J. Crean, in opposition.

Case Details

Case Name: Kupstis v. Michaud
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Feb 8, 1990
Citation: 214 Conn. 801
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.