midpage

Kunst v. KunstKunst v. Kunst

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Sep 5, 1989
No. 88-2226
Versions:551 So. 2d 522
14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134
1989 WL 104056
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5027
PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order determining custody was supported by substantial, competent evidence. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm. Richardson v. Richardson, 442 So.2d 1005 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). This affirmance is without prejudice to either party’s right to return to the trial court to seek partition of the jointly owned real property, or to have the trial court determine each party’s financial responsibility for expenses and entitlement to profits relating to that property.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kunst v. Kunst
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 5, 1989
Citations: 551 So. 2d 522; 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2134; 1989 WL 104056; 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5027; No. 88-2226
Docket Number: No. 88-2226
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In