Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

51 Mich. 185 | Mich. | 1883

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is whether the evidence in the case conclusively made out negligence ■on the part of plaintiff contributing to the injury of which he complains. Unless it did, he was entitled to recover. "We find, on examination, that there was evidence of such negligence, and also evidence of dne care; and the question-having been decided on the facts in plaintiffs favor, the finding is conclusive, and no question of law arises for decision now.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.