134 Wis. 57 | Wis. | 1907
No issue is taken with the appellant’s contention that, as a strict rule governing legal rights, the payment of a debt secured by mortgage extinguishes the mortgage completely, and that such mortgage cannot be revived and become a valid lien upon real estate without the formalities required by law for the original execution of mortgages. But we deem such principle noncontrolling of the rights of these parties, for two reasons: First, that there is no antagonism by any clear preponderance of the evidence to the finding of the court that the transaction agreed to by defendant bank, Haclcett, and the plaintiff was that the bank should take over and continue to carry the debt of $5,700 theretofore owned by Haclcett and secured by the real-estate mortgage, and that the mortgage should not be satisfied or extinguished but should continue as a security for that debt.
The foregoing is of course entirely sufficient to dispose of this appeal. But we cannot forbear to point to a further consideration, namely, although this mortgage had become
There was nothing to suggest insolvency on the part of Wason at the time of these transactions and they are in no wise connected with the bankruptcy. Hence the trustee in bankruptcy has shown no rights greater than those which Wason would have had.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.