History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kronick v. Correale
257 Mass. 104
Mass.
1926
Check Treatment
By the Court.

This suit cannot be maintained unless the plaintiffs prove that the male defendants were copartners. The judge made an express finding of fact that the burden of proof had not been sustained. There was no error of law in making this finding. It was peculiarly the province of the trial judge to settle that question. His action in this particular will not be disturbed. In view of this finding of fact, all the requests of the plaintiff were denied rightly. The circumstance that the bill was taken for confessed against one defendant did not bind the other defendants. Goff v. Hathaway, 180 Mass. 497.

Decree dismissing bill affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Kronick v. Correale
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 22, 1926
Citation: 257 Mass. 104
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.