Krebs v. StateKrebs v. State
In this case the appellant argues that resentencing is necessitated by the Florida Supreme Court case of Hansbrough v. State,
The appellant contends in his brief that even if the “professional manner” reason is a valid ground for departure, the remaining invalid ground (premeditation) requires remand for resentencing based on Davis v. State,
Davis and Albritton have been superseded by section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1987), which became effective July 1,1987. That statute now provides: “When multiple reasons exist to support a departure from a guidelines sentence, the departure shall be upheld when at least one circumstance or factor justifies the departure regardless of the presence of other circumstances or factors found not to justify departure.”
The offenses for which the appellant was sentenced occurred in 1981. The sentencing guidelines affect substantive rights of a defendant, and cannot be applied ex post facto. Miller v. Florida,
Pursuant to Albritton v. State, we must remand for resentencing. At that time, the trial court should require the defendant to clearly select or reject the sentencing guidelines as a matter of record because the crimes for which he was convicted occurred on July 2, 1981. See Kearse v. State,
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.