History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kratz v. Lien
37 Ohio Law. Abs. 25
Ohio Ct. App.
1940
Check Treatment

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Examination of the evidence adduced herein, convinces the members of this court that the real estate sought to be sold is being sold by The Sumner Property Co., a distinct corporate entity, and not by the superintendent of banks of Ohio.

Compliance with the provisions of §710-95 GC, is not required of private corporations.

The prayer of the petition of the plaintiff (appellant) is denied, and the petition dismissed, at appellant’s costs.

WASHBURN, PJ., DOYLE, J., & STEVENS, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kratz v. Lien
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 1, 1940
Citation: 37 Ohio Law. Abs. 25
Docket Number: No. 3337
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.