History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kramer v. Sheehy
316 U.S. 646
SCOTUS
1942
Check Treatment

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nevada.

Per Curiam:

The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Kramer v. Sheehy
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 25, 1942
Citation: 316 U.S. 646
Docket Number: No. 1202
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.