History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kramb v. Haring
192 A.D. 948
N.Y. App. Div.
1920
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, while the statement of the witness Fischer should have been received as bearing upon the credibility of his testimony, we think the substance of it was elicited upon cross-examination so far as material, and that no prejudicial error was committed in rejecting it. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kramb v. Haring
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 15, 1920
Citation: 192 A.D. 948
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.