History
  • No items yet
midpage
Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards
85 Or. App. 477
Or. Ct. App.
1987
Check Treatment
DEITS, J.

Claimant has filed a petition for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. In our opinion, Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards, 84 Or App 127, 733 P2d 113 (1987), we said:

“[The doctor’s] statement that claimant’s injury is permanent only indicates a waxing and waning of symptoms of the chronic condition for which he had received an award.”

We grant reconsideration only to correct a factual error. Petitioner correctly points out that he had not received an award on his claim. As noted in our opinion, 84 Or App at 131, the claim was classified as nondisabling. We still hold that claimant did not perfect' his aggravation claim within the statutory period.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Case Details

Case Name: Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: May 20, 1987
Citation: 85 Or. App. 477
Docket Number: WCB 84-02476; CA A37693
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.