History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kraemer v. City of Newark
115 N.J.L. 519
| N.J. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

We affirm the judgment of the Supreme Court for the reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, except that we find it unnecessary to determine whether the appellant was an officer of the city of Newark and therefore make no suggestion as to the fact thereon. *Page 520 For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Kraemer v. City of Newark
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 9, 1935
Citation: 115 N.J.L. 519
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.