| Mass. App. Ct. | Mar 6, 1974
The proponent appeals from an order of a Probate Court allowing a motion to frame jury issues. The issues ordered to be framed are: (1) soundness of mind of the deceased at the time of the execution of the alleged will, and (2) whether the execution of the will was procured by undue influence. The motion was heard upon statements by counsel of expected evidence and pleadings in related litigation. We are to decide the case giving due weight to the decision of the probate judge. Simoneau v. O’Brien, 311 Mass. 68" date_filed="1942-02-25" court="Mass." case_name="Simoneau v. O'Brien">311 Mass. 68, 74 (1942). To be decided is whether there is “a genuine and doubtful question of fact to be determined and evidence of such substantial nature as to afford reasonable expectation of a result favorable to the . . . [contestant].” Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Blaisdell, 333 Mass. 51" date_filed="1955-07-06" court="Mass." case_name="Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Blaisdell">333 Mass. 51, 56 (1955). Applying these settled principles to the prospective evidence, we conclude that the order of the judge was warranted.
Order allowing motion for jury issues affirmed.