Kowalski v. Hines

96 N.J.L. 293 | N.J. | 1921

Fee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Kaliscli in the Mupreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Cujee Justice, Hwayze, Trench aed, Parker, Minturn. Kaxzhnbacti, HeppenniiTirer, Wirliams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For ¡eveisal—"White, J. 1.

midpage