History
  • No items yet
midpage
Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission
222 Conn. 912
Conn.
1992
Check Treatment

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 443, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s decision and remand the case with direction to grant the writ of mandamus on the ground that a failure of a planning and zoning commission properly to publish a prehearing notice, as required by General Statutes § 8-26, amounted to a failure of the commission to act pursuant to General Statutes §§ 8-26 and 8-26d?”

Case Details

Case Name: Koskoff v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: May 28, 1992
Citation: 222 Conn. 912
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.