Kory Dyer et al vs Janina Servino et al

Jul 23, 2026
515, 2025

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the Court of Chancery‘s Post-Trial Memorandum Opinion dated November 5, 2025, and Final Order dated November 24, 2025.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths

Justice

Notes

1
It appears evident to this Court that the width of the express easement over Lot 5 is 25.04 ft. See, e.g., A145 (Trial Ex. 15); A163 (Trial Ex. 20). The portion of the jughandle that falls within those 25.04 ft. is included in the express easement.