History
  • No items yet
midpage
Konopka v. Bruckman
265 A.D. 1068
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1943
|
Check Treatment

Ho opinion. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination, with the following memorandum: The conclusion of the State Liquor Authority is based wholly upon inferences which are not warranted by the proof. There is no evidence to justify the revocation.

Case Details

Case Name: Konopka v. Bruckman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 18, 1943
Citation: 265 A.D. 1068
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.