midpage

Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co.Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals
Apr 10, 1989
88-L-13-150
Versions:56 Ohio App. 3d 173
565 N.E.2d 882
1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1240
Christley, P.J.

This is an accelerated calendar case.

Despite appellant’s failure to include in his brief a statement of the assigned errors, as required under App. R. 16(A)(2), a review of his brief shows that: one, appellant does not dispute the merits of the trial court’s decision; and two, appellant contends the Supreme Court erred in not disqualifying the trial judge for alleged prejudice.

The Supreme Court has specifically held that a court of appeals has no authority to determine issues on the disqualification of trial judges. Beer v. Griffith (1978), 54 Ohio St. 2d 440, 8 O.O. 3d 438, 377 N.E. 2d 775. The Ohio Constitution grants exclusive jurisdiction over these issues to the Chief Justice and his designees. It follows from this holding, and from the general principles of appellate review, that a court of appeals cannot reverse a Supreme Court decision on this point.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Mahoney and Ford, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Kondrat v. Ralph Ingersoll Publishing Co.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 10, 1989
Citations: 56 Ohio App. 3d 173; 565 N.E.2d 882; 1989 Ohio App. LEXIS 1240; 88-L-13-150
Docket Number: 88-L-13-150
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In