—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated January 31, 1997, which denied its motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated January 18, 1996, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability upon the City’s default in responding to the motion.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
It is well settled that on a motion to vacate a default pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a), a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,
In the instant case, not only did the City of New York repeatedly fail to comply with the court’s discovery orders or pay
Moreover, the City’s affidavit of merit, which contained only conclusory assertions and denials of negligence, was insufficient to establish a meritorious defense (see, Peterson v Scandurra Trucking Co.,
