32:T536,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co., 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 295","datePublished":"1910-10-04","legislationDate":"1910-10-04","citation":"Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co., 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 295 (Wis. 1910)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Wisconsin Supreme Court","description":"Read the full text of Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co. (Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co., 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 295 (Wis. 1910)). This legal opinion, filed in 1910-10-04, from the Wisconsin Supreme Court discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/kola-lumber-co-v-stoughton--8189969"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/kola-lumber-co-v-stoughton--8189969","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co., Wisconsin Supreme Court, Kola Lumber Co. v. Stoughton Wagon Co., 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 295 (Wis. 1910)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4ad, Babnes, J.

If any contract relation existed between plaintiff and defendant, it existed by implication only. Certain facts were testified to from which the court might well have inferred an implied contract on the part of the defend*330ant to pay plaintiff for tbe lumber. Other facts were shown from which it could be legitimately inferred that the plaintiff shipped the lumber in part execution of the contract between the Ellisville Lumber Company and the defendant and upon the credit of the Ellisville Lumber Company. It is as logical to draw the latter inference from the evidence as it is the former.

° “Upon evidence fairly justifying either of two inferences,, the decision of the.trial court must control.” Spuhr v. Kolb, 111 Wis. 119, 120, 86 N. W. 562.

It is not the custom of this court to embody in its opinions the evidence sustaining the findings of trial courts, inasmuch as no useful purpose would be served by so doing.

By the Court.- — Judgment affirmed.