Kohlhepp v. Kohlhepp's Exor, 143 Ky. 721

Kohlhepp v. Kohlhepp's Exor

143 Ky. 721 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1911

Opinión op the Coubt by

Judge Cabboll

Reversing-

George Kohlhepp died testate in 1897, leaving two sons to whom he gave his estate. In the third' clause of his will he gave to his executor in trust for the use and benefit of his sons,, Yance Porter and John A. Kohlhepp, certain real estate described in the will; and in the sixth clause provided that:

“In the event of the death of either of my said sons, without lawful heirs of his body, the survivor and his lawful heirs shall inherit all of my estate, to be- held and used only as above provided and not otherwise.”

And in the seventh clause, that:

“At the expiration of five years from the recording of this will, if my son, Yance Porter Kohlhepp shall have been sober, discreet and moral in habit for the last two preceding years of said five years, then and in that event he thus behaving shall have the right to take possession and control of his bequest herein, but not otherwise. ’ ’

In October, 1910, the appellant, Yance Porter, filed this petition against the executor and trustee, and John A. Kohlhepp, asking for a construction of the will— averring that the words in the sixth clause providing that in the event of the death of one of his sons without lawful heirs the survivor should inherit the deceased’s son’s share of his estate, should be construed to mean if *722either of them died without lawful heirs' during the life of Gf-eorge Kohlhepp and set up that the seventh clause of the will providing that' the share of Vance Porter Kohlhepp should be given to him provided he.remained sober, discreet and moral for five years, was void because it failed to provide any one whose duty it is tó judge as to whether he has been sober and moral the said length of time;, and it is further null and void for the reason that said words are . too vague and uncertain ’ for the court itself ■ to pass thereon. He also -alleged that for the last two years of said five years he was- sober, discreet and moral. That in July, 1907, he quit drinking intoxicating liquors entirely, and from July, 1907, to the institution of this action had not drank any spirituous, vinous or malt liquors, and had been moral, discreet and continually at work.

The trustee- and executor in his answer expressed a willingness to surrender the estate to -Vance Porter Kohlhepp if he could lawfully do so.

The depositions of several witnesses were taken to show the sobriety, morality and industrious habits of Vance Porter Kohlhepp. But, upon hearing the case the court dismissed the petition, and hence this appeal. . ,

Without discussing the validity of clause seven, wq think the evidence fairly, shows that Kohlhepp was “sober, discreet and moral in liabits” for the last two years of the five years referred to, and hence was en-i titled to take possession of the estate devised to him. The contingency mentioned in clause six, under all the authorities, must be construed to refer to the death of Kohlhepp before the testator or before he became entitled to the possession of the devised estate, and it is not necessary to determine which.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, with directions for proceedings in conformity with this opinion.