Koenigsberger v. Mial
90 N.J.L. 695
N.J.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in'the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaltscti, White, Heppeniieiaiisr, Williams. Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.