104 Wis. 409 | Wis. | 1899
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action to restrain the ■defendant from carrying out the resolution of the defendant and filling in the mill race from defendant’s southerly end .to the north line of Milwaukee street, or any part thereof.
The complaint alleges, in effect, that at the time of the •commencement of this action, and for more than forty years .next prior thereto, there was a dam across Nock river at the place described, and a water power created thereby, and the •.same was then within the limits of the defendant city, and also a mill race and flume connected with and appurtenant ■to the dam, on the east side of the river, and near thereto, which mill race and flume extended from the dam in a southerly direction for about 1,000 feet, running through what was commonly known as the “ hydraulic reserve ” and blocks 30, 39, and 40 in the First ward of the city to that part of block 40 where the brick flouring mill of the Globe Milling Company formerly stood, and which a few years before was destroyed by fire; that April 27, 1886, and for some time prior thereto and thereafter, one Frank Koenig, father of the plaintiffs, since deceased, was the sole owner in fee and lawfully possessed of the undivided one-half of the whole of the dam, and of all the water power connected therewith or appurtenant thereto at the east end and ■eastern half thereof, subject only to certain easements or water rights; that he was also the sole owner in fee and lawfully possessed of the whole of the mill race and flume -extending from the dam down to the south line of lot 1 in
The complaint then alleges that April 27, 1886, Frank Koenig and the Globe Milling Company, being such owners, duly entered into a written agreement under seal, witnessed, acknowledged, and recorded, to the effect that the Globe Milling Company, in consideration of $7,000 to be paid to it by Frank Koenig, thereby covenanted and agreed to convey to Frank Koenig, his heirs and assigns, 4,948.8 cubic feet of water per minute, which was by the partition judgment adjudged to Miller and Sleeper, by warranty deed, subject to all charges that might thereafter accrue or should be imposed upon such water for repairs and rebuilding of the dam, and the river next above the dam on the east side of the river, and for repairing and rebuilding and maintaining the main race and flume from the dam down to the brick
The complaint further alleges that thereafter, and on April
The complaint then alleges that ever since the city acquired such right, title, and interest the plaintiffs and the defendant have been, and still were and are, the owners in fee and in lawful possession of the mill race and flume from the dam down to that part of block 40 where the flouring mill of the Globe Milling Company formerly stood, in common and undivided; that such purchase by the city was under and by virtue of an ordinance duly passed and made September 15,1896; that the flouring mill and appurtenances on lot 1, block 30, and the strip of land north and adjacent thereto, were, before the commencement of this action, the sole property of the plaintiffs, and have been continuously in use and operation, conducted, managed, and operated solely by the plaintiffs, ever since the death of Frank Koenig, as a flouring, feed, and custom mill, with a large and lucra
The facts alleged in the complaint are somewhat complicated, but it appears from a careful reading that the mill races and- flume extend from the dam down to the place where the'brick flouring mill of the'Globe Milling Company formerly stood,— a distance of about 1,000 feet; that from the dam south to a bridge near the mill of the plaintiffs — a distance of about 400 feet — is designated as the mill race, and which, for convenience, will be called the wpper mill race; that from that bridge south to the north line of Milwaukee street — a distance of about 325 feet — is designated as the flume; that from the north line of Milwaukee street south to the place where the brick flouring mill of-the Globe Milling Company stood when it was destroyed by fire — a distance of about 275 feet — is designated as the mill race, and which for convenience will be called the lower mill race; "
Eut counsel contends that the plaintiffs have an adequate remedy at law, and hence that the demurrer should be sustained. We are clearly of the'“opinion that the-plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law. In so far as the preservation of the reservoir for holding water is beneficial to the running of their mill, the plaintiffs have the right to maintain the same according to the agreements, stipulations, conditions, and covenants mentioned. The injury complained of goes to the impairment of the use of the property belonging to the plaintiffs. The right to an injunction in such a case is supported by numerous authorities. Pettigrew v. Evansville, 25 Wis. 223; Wilson v. Mineral Point, 39 Wis. 160; Lawson v. Menasha W. W. Co. 59 Wis. 393; Fox River F. & P. Co. v. Kelley, 70 Wis. 287; Patten P. Co. v. Kaukauna W. P. Co. 70 Wis. 659; Kimberly & Clark Co. v. Hewitt, 75 Wis. 371. It is not the case of a mere breach of contract or private trespass.
By the Gotort.— The order of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings according to law.