History
  • No items yet
midpage
Koehler v. Campbell
36 N.Y.S. 1110
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1894
Check Treatment
LAWRENCE, J.

In this case, I am of the opinion that the defendant and his attorney were guilty of deceit in interposing a false answer; that the service of such answer impeded, if it did not defeat, the rights of the plain*1111tiffs; and that such service was a contempt of court, and is punishable accordingly. A fine in the sum of $832.91, the amount of the^ judgment, and the costs of this proceeding, which are fixed at the sum of $50, is therefore imposed upon each of the parties. Martin Cantine Co. v. Warshauer, 7 Misc. Rep. 412, 28 N. Y. Supp. 139.

Settle order on one day’s notice, in circuit (part 1).

Case Details

Case Name: Koehler v. Campbell
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 21, 1894
Citation: 36 N.Y.S. 1110
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.