| Tex. App. | Apr 10, 1907

The transcript contains only two assignments of error, neither of which are copied in appellant's brief, as required by Rule 29. On account of this violation of that rule appellee in its brief objects to appellant's brief and to consideration by this court of the grounds for reversal therein urged. Though appellee's brief has been on file over three months, appellant has made no effort to remedy the defect in his brief. Therefore, we sustain appellee's objection. (Chappell v. Missouri Pac. Ry., 75 Tex. 82" date_filed="1889-11-12" court="Tex. App." case_name="Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Fort Worth Street Railway Co.">75 Tex. 82; Harris v. Crabtree, 4 Texas Civ. App. 321[4 Tex. Civ. App. 321" date_filed="1893-10-11" court="Tex. App." case_name="Harris v. Crabtree">4 Tex. Civ. App. 321]; Horseman v. Coleman County, 57 S.W. Rep., 304; Bowman v. Hoffman, 74 S.W. Rep., 340.)

We have discovered no fundamental error and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.