History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kober v. Lyle
177 A.D. 903
N.Y. App. Div.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, consisting of an amended complaint and demurrer thereto. The defendant did not make a cross motion. It was not in accordance with the practice of this court as' established by Ventriniglia v. Eichner (138 App. Div. 274) upon denial of plaintiff’s motion, to enter an order as if the defendant had also moved. Therefore, the order appealed from should be modified by confining it to a denial of plaintiff’s motion, leaving the defendant to make such motion as he may be advised; and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Shearn, JJ. Order modified as stated in order, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Kober v. Lyle
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1917
Citation: 177 A.D. 903
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.