History
  • No items yet
midpage
Knutsen v. Cinque
113 A.D. 677
N.Y. App. Div.
1906
Check Treatment
Gaynor, J.:

The action did not accrue until the expiration of the lease, for the plaintiff could have restored the stalls.up to that time. It follows that the right of action set up- in the counterclaim'is in the defendant’s grantee. He purchased the land" subject to -the lease, and succeeded to his grantor’s rights, under the covenants of the-lease. The covenant to surrender the premises in as good condition as when received ran with the land (Demarest v. Willard[, 8 Cow.. 206 ; Chaplin on L. & T. §, 338).

The judgment should be affirmed.

Hirschberg, P. J., Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, .with costs-.

Case Details

Case Name: Knutsen v. Cinque
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 15, 1906
Citation: 113 A.D. 677
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.