No. 84-1007 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Mar 9, 1988
We originally reversed and remanded this case for new trial. See Knox v. State, 471 So. 2d 59" date_filed="1985-04-24" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="Knox v. State">471 So.2d 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. See State v. Knox, 495 So. 2d 166" date_filed="1986-10-02" court="Fla." case_name="State v. Knox">495 So.2d 166 (Fla.1986). We were directed to determine if the comment involved was harmless under the standards set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129" date_filed="1986-07-17" court="Fla." case_name="State v. DiGuilio">491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and Crawford v. State, 491 So. 2d 1142" date_filed="1986-07-17" court="Fla." case_name="Crawford v. State">491 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1986). We have done so and determine the error to have been harmless. Accordingly, we now affirm.