Knox v. StateKnox v. State
Appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion made pursuant to
The state responds to appellant‘s motion with the argument that appellant must address this issue exclusively with the department of corrections and not with the sentencing court. See Henderson v. State, 632 So.2d 653 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (holding award of credit time after sentencing is matter for department of corrections by way of a writ of mandamus). While Henderson does hold that the actual award of credit time after sentencing is a matter for the department of corrections, that is not the issue raised by the appellant. Rather, appellant is seeking to have the trial court award him the correct amount of pre-sentence credit time.
Therefore based on the foregoing, we remand this cause to the trial court for an appropriate determination of the appellant‘s pre-sentence credit time.
Remanded with instructions.