Knox v. Johnson
33 N.Y.S. 1129
| N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1894
PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the court erred in receiving evidence that the credit was given to defendant. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the court erred in charging that a recovery could be had upon the letter and the standard mortgage clause, and that they amount to a contract between the parties, so that the nlaintiff was entitled to recover the premium on demand. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event.