62 S.E. 789 | S.C. | 1908
November 16. 1908. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from the order of Judge Watts allowing plaintiff to file a supplemental complaint in this action. The plaintiff began suit against the defendant company for damages alleged to have resulted to her as the owner of an undivided fourth interest in a tract of land on Broad River, in Union county, by the erection of defendant's dam across that river. Defendant interposed as a defense that plaintiff's cotenants had granted easement to overflow said land. Pending this suit an action by the cotenants to partition said land was begun and ended without the knowledge of the defendant company, and partition was had without any regard to the alleged right of the defendant company as owner of easement to overflow a portion of said land, and the portion mainly burdened by said easement was allotted to the plaintiff. Then plaintiff moved to file supplemental complaint, setting forth the result of the partition proceedings, and this motion was resisted by defendant company, and proceedings by it were begun to open such judgment and have another partition, with due consideration of its rights. *541
The proper method by which to bring to the attention of the Court facts occurring after the service of the original complaint is by supplemental complaint; but inasmuch as this Court, in the case of Ex parte Union Mfg. Power Co.,in re Sue R. Jeter and Mary A. Jeter, against Sara IdaKnight, just filed, has decided to open said judgment in partition and allow the defendant company to intervene, so as to protect as far as practicable its rights as grantee of an easement by two of the cotenants, we deem it proper to set aside the order allowing the supplemental complaint as premature until the final determination of the partition proceedings, at which time such supplemental proceedings as may be necessary in this case may be allowed.
The order appealed from is, therefore, set aside.
