midpage

Knickerbacker v. ColverKnickerbacker v. Colver

New York Supreme Court
Feb 15, 1828
Reporters:
Curia.

Where the process is not bailable, it may go against any number of defendants jointly; and yet the ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‍plamtiff may declare against them severally. (3 John. 538; l T. E. 696[697. l B * P. 49; 6 B. * P. 82.)

By the course of proceeding, these suits became separate tQ eyery purpose; and are ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‍not to be considered as a joint suit defended by each defendant sirnvl cum the other. The defendants are to be treated as joint trespassers sued separately, in which case the plaintiff can’ have but one ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‍satis* *112faction; but he may assess damages separately; and then elect de melioribus damnis, and recover costs against . ° The plaintiff, therefore, is entitled to recover his damages but once ; and having either received them ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‍from Hawes, or discharged him without payment, that act must be considered a satisfaction or release of the damages as to both. The plaintiff ought not to collect the damages on the other execution. ‍​​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​​​​​​‌​‌​​‌​‍The five dollars damages must be indorsed satisfied on that; but the costs may be collected.

Eule accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Knickerbacker v. Colver
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1828
Citation: 8 Cow. 111
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Log In