1 Rand. 249 | Va. | 1822
December 12.
delivered the opinion of the court.
The court excluding the evidence in relation to the supposed fraud of the appellant, it not being put in issue by any thing in the pleadings, is of opinion, that the conflicting evidence touching the question, whether the bill of sale from Knibb to Dixon, was intended by the parties as a security to Dixon, for payments to be made by him in behalf of Knibb, or as an absolute and unconditional
Judge Green did not sit, the case haying been argued before his appointment.