History
  • No items yet
midpage
Klussman v. Copeland
18 Ind. 306
Ind.
1862
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is,, whether the heirs or representatives, or both, of a deceased maker of a *307joint promissory note should be joined in an action against the survivor. Ye do not think such joinder is required.

Chandler § Hynes, for the appellant. Jas. H. Blythe, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Klussman v. Copeland
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1862
Citation: 18 Ind. 306
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.