Klotz v. RabinowitzKlotz v. Rabinowitz
—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated June
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Eric Klotz allegedly suffered debilitating damage to a nerve as a result of hernia surgery performed by the defendant doctor on April 24, 1989. The defendant had provided post-operative care related to the surgery on April 30, 1989, and May 7, 1989. Due to persistent pain in the area of the hernia surgery and upon the advice of his primary physician, the plaintiff returned to the defendant on August 29, 1991, and January 19, 1992, for a diagnosis as to the source of the pain and for treatment. On these visits, the defendant allegedly failed to determine that the pain had been caused by the hernia surgery.
The plaintiff commenced this action within 2V2 years of the last treatment by the defendant relating to the hernia surgery. Thus, the court properly determined that the defendant’s conduct fell within the continuous course of treatment doctrine (see, Nykorchuck v Henriques,