Klotz v. Newark Paving Co.
86 N.J.L. 690 | N.J. | 1914
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chieb Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Terhune, "Williams, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
