5 Pa. Commw. 62 | Pa. Commw. Ct. | 1972
Opinion by
F. Scott Fitzgerald, chronicler of a less serious age than the present, observed that the bouquet of alcohol,
The appellant was not represented by counsel at the hearing before the referee. His counsel in brief and argument in this Court asserts that appellant was denied due process at the referee’s hearing because he assertedly was not permitted to cross-examine the employer’s witnesses, and before the Board because he allegedly was denied opportunity to present argument orally or by brief. The record reveals that the referee did not deny the appellant the right to cross-examine. Indeed, the appellant did not refute the testimony of the employer’s witnesses but sought only to mitigate the effect of the testimony by declaring that his drinking occurred in the evening and not during working hours. Neither at the hearing before the referee nor at
The decision is affirmed.