History
  • No items yet
midpage
Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield
25 A.2d 879
N.J.
1942
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 7.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Colie, Wells, JJ. 5.

Case Details

Case Name: Klingel v. Town of Bloomfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 23, 1942
Citation: 25 A.2d 879
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.