History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kitselman v. Reid
266 F. 256
D.C. Cir.
1920
Check Treatment
SMYTH, Chief Justice.

From a decision by the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority to Reid, Reid & Kelley, the senior parties, in an interference, Kitselman appeals.

, The invention involved relates to double series machines Jor making two rolls of fence simultaneously. This appeal is a companion of the appeal in Nos. 1303 and 1304, 49 App. D. C. 377, 266 Fed. 255, in which the same parties are concerned, this day decided. The three tribunals of the Patent Office concur in awarding priority to Reid, Reid & Kelley. Where this is so, unless there is manifest error, the decision of the Commissioner should bé affirmed. Greenawalt v. Dwight, 49 App. D. C. 82, 258 Fed. 982, and cases therein cited; Hopkins v. Riegger, 49 App. D. C. 188, 262 Fed. 642; and Kennicott v. Caps, 49 App. D. C. 187, 262 Fed. 641. We find no such error in this case, and therefore the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kitselman v. Reid
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: May 3, 1920
Citation: 266 F. 256
Docket Number: No. 1305
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.