260 Conn. 336 | Conn. | 2002
Opinion
In this certified appeal, the named plaintiff, Pelagia Kitmirides,
The facts are undisputed. The plaintiff was a pedestrian who was injured by an underinsured motorist as she was walking away from a vehicle owned by her father-in-law. After exhausting the insurance coverage
The trial court rendered summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that, despite the listing of the plaintiff as an additional driver on the declaration page, the terms of the policy were unambiguous and precluded underinsured motorist coverage for the plaintiff. The Appellate Court affirmed that judgment. Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co., supra, 65 Conn. App. 730. We granted certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the named plaintiff, listed as a driver of a covered vehicle on the declaration page of the automobile policy issued by the defendant, but not listed as a named insured, was not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under the policy?” Kitmirides v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co., 258 Conn. 939, 786 A.2d 425 (2001). This appeal followed.
After fully considering the briefs and arguments of the parties, we conclude that the judgment of the Appellate Court should be affirmed. The thoughtful and compre
The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed.
Other plaintiffs in this appeal are Anna Panagiotides and Nikolaos Kitmirides. The claim of Panagiotides is contingent upon the claim of Pelagia Kitmirides, and no claim is raised regarding Nikolaos Kitmirides. We refer, therefore, to Pelagia Kitmirides as the plaintiff.
Included in the uninsured motorists coverage was coverage for underinsured motor vehicles.