437 S.W.2d 867 | Tex. Crim. App. | 1969
OPINION
The offense is theft from the person; the punishment, 7 years.
We have examined the record on appeal and the grounds of error set forth in appellant’s brief. Four of the six grounds relate to the sufficiency of the evidence.
Appellant did not testify but offered testimony which raised the issue of alibi.
The fact issues were resolved against appellant. The evidence, viewed from the standpoint most favorable to the verdict, sustains the jury’s finding.
The fifth ground of error complains that the court erred by not allowing the examining trial record into evidence, as requested by defense counsel. The record reflects no ruling on the request and no objection to any action of the court in connection therewith.
The remaining ground of error relates to argument of state’s counsel to the effect that appellant’s witnesses were not worthy of belief because they were prostitutes.
The record reflects no objection to any remark of counsel for the state in his argument. The ground of error is overruled. Piraino v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 415 S.W.2d 416.
The judgment is affirmed.