166 So. 774 | Ala. | 1936
It may be conceded that the guardian had the right to dispose of the note and mortgage. Echols v. Speake,
Whether the note, which on its face is payable to Mrs. Sparks as "guardian" and was assigned by her as "guardian," was notice to the purchaser, Kirsch, of a probable limited or restricted authority to negotiate the same, 8 C.J. 515; Wolffe v. State,
The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.