History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kirland v. Kline
16 Ind. 313
Ind.
1861
Check Treatment
Per Ouriam.

Suit upon a note. Application for continuanee on account of absent witnesses. Application overruled. Judgment on the note. The defendant was served with process July 30. The term of the Court commenced on August 13, following, and the cause was called on the 15th of that *314month, when the application for continuance was made. No steps had been taken to procure the evidence of the witnesses, though they resided, as the defendant all the time knew, in Dayton, Ohio, within five hours’ ride of Indianapolis. Due diligence was not shown, and the continuance was rightly refused.

O. W. Wilson, for the appellant. J. N. Sweetser, for the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Kirland v. Kline
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 7, 1861
Citation: 16 Ind. 313
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.