Kirby v. Lockport Paper Co.

115 A.D. 883 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1906

Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. Held, that the question as to whether, under the. Labor Law,^† the shafting should have been guarded was a question of fact for tíre jury, and not one of fact for the court. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., not sitting.

† See Laws of 1897, chap. 415, § 81, as amd. by Laws of 1904, chap. 291.—[Rep.