No. 344 | SCOTUS | May 22, 1916
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U.S. 477" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1909-02-23" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/bagley-v-general-fire-extinguisher-co-96973?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="96973">212 U. S. 477; Weir v. Rountree, 216 U.S. 607" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1910-02-28" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/weir-v-rountree-97209?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97209">216 U. S. 607; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U.S. 575" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1915-06-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/roman-catholic-church-of-st-anthony-of-padua-v-pennsylvania-railroad-1115043?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1115043">237 U. S. 575. (2) Provident Savings Society v. Ford, 114 U.S. 635" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1885-05-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/provident-savings-life-assurance-society-v-ford-91414?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="91414">114 U. S. 635, 641-642; Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U.S. 586" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1888-12-17" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/metcalf-v-watertown-92368?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="92368">128 U. S. 586, 588; Pope v. Louisville, New Albany &c. Ry., 173 U.S. 573" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1899-04-03" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/pope-v-louisville-new-albany--chicago-railway-co-95034?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="95034">173 U. S. 573, 580-581. See United States ex rel. Kinney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 222 U.S. 283" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1911-12-18" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/united-states-ex-rel-kinney-v-united-states-fidelity--guaranty-co-97497?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="97497">222 U. S. 283;