History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kinney v. Corbin
132 Pa. 341
Pa.
1890
Check Treatment
Per Curiam :

The negligence in this case was not that of the defendant company, but of Missimer, the boss or foreman, under whom the plaintiff was working, and who was, under all our cases, a fellow-workman. This was of itself sufficient to justify the learned judge below in entering a judgment of nonsuit. Aside from this, he makes out, upon the uncontradicted testimony, a very strong case of contributory negligence.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Kinney v. Corbin
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Feb 17, 1890
Citation: 132 Pa. 341
Docket Number: No. 153
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.